“My daughter was a California constituent, and Nancy Pelosi not only, I feel like, orchestrated the death of my daughter.”
“I’ve reached out to Nancy Pelosi’s office several times, and she has yet to call me back because she’s too busy playing in her clubhouse with all of her elite people,” Witthoeft said.
She then reminded the House Speaker about who she really works for.“You know, it’s the people’s house. It’s not your house, Nancy,” Witthoeft declared.“It’s the people’s house.
That’s my message to Nancy Pelosi,” she added.Wnd.com reports: Despite the many claims of violence that occurred on Jan. 6, evidence has yet to surface suggesting Babbitt herself was reckless or threatening.
An earlier report from The Western Journal found that there had been no documented reports of Babbitt starting fires or attacking police officers.
Her mother wants to know who is responsible for her death.“The Capitol Police should be held accountable like every other police department in the country.”
Witthoeft isn’t the only one fighting for Babbitt.In a July 1 statement, former President Donald Trump asked only the following question: “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?”President Trump asks who shot Ashli Babbitt.
Every American should know who shot Ashli Babbitt. An unarmed young woman was shot at point-blank range and killed for trespassing.
Any cop in this country they did that anywhere else would already be in prison. pic.twitter.com/2UKmhrIzEc— Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) July 1, 2021Trump’s statement brought national awareness to the issue, causing Babbitt’s name to trend on Twitter.
Back in April, Babbitt’s family announced that they were suing the Capitol Police for “at least $10 million” in damages.
For the suit to be successful, the family would have to prove that the officer responsible had used “constitutionally unreasonable” force against Babbitt.
On April 14, after conducting an investigation, the Department of Justice released a statement on the matter.“
Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so ‘willfully,’ which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law,” the DOJ said.
“As this requirement has been interpreted by the courts, evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent required under Section 242.”
In the era of police accountability and transparency, why has the death of Ashli Babbitt been swept under the rug?
No one is marching in the streets for her. No one is burning down police precincts.Despite what the establishment media and Democratic politicians have claimed, the events of Jan. 6. — while shameful and wrong — did not constitute an “insurrection.”
The continued problem from that day has been the government’s lack of transparency about Babbitt’s death.People want answers. They won’t forget — and Babbitt’s mother isn’t going to let them.