THE AUDACITY OF OBAMA: JUDGE IN FLYNN CASE CLEARLY TAKING DIRECTION FROM OBAMA – SOROS – CLINTON CRIME CARTEL. – powerglobal.us – The Conservative Voice in Global News

Sullivan has no legal right to make such a request. Under the law, he has no standing to protest the original order and seek a rehearing.In our system of justice, the right of review extends only to the litigants themselves — defendants, plaintiffs, and in certain circumstances prosecutors. This is well established.Judges, who are supposed to be neutral arbiters, can contest nothing from a higher court.

But

Sullivan has proven to be anything but neutral. His biased conduct and demonstrated animosity toward Flynn is a disgrace to the bench.Federal courts have consistently held that “it is procedurally improper for a district judge to enter an appearance in an appeal … whether as a party, intervenor, or amicus.” (Ligon v. City of New York, 736, F.3d 166, 2013). This is so because “a district judge has no legal interest in a case or its outcome, and, consequently suffers no legal injury.”In other words, it is the role of a judge to dispense due process, not receive it. A judge serves as a disinterested adjudicator, not a self-interested party.

Source: THE AUDACITY OF OBAMA: JUDGE IN FLYNN CASE CLEARLY TAKING DIRECTION FROM OBAMA – SOROS – CLINTON CRIME CARTEL. – powerglobal.us – The Conservative Voice in Global News