— Terry_backs_Trump (@TerryforTrump) May 10, 2020
Is this satire? https://t.co/mU6vDnJSk8
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) May 10, 2020
That’s like Hitler saying Happy Hanukkah https://t.co/SW0PuH4ZPd
— 🎶Ꮥωєєт Ꮦнιηg🦌 (@itsSweetThing) May 11, 2020
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman admitted he made up elements of President Donald Trump’s call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an official summary.Prior to the call, Vindman included a discussion about corruption in the talking points provided to the president but Trump did not use them in the call.The summary Vindman wrote after the call read:President Trump underscored the unwavering support of the United States for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity – within its internationally recognized borders – and expressed his commitment to work together with President-elect Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people to implement reforms that strengthen democracy, increase prosperity, and root out corruption.
Why is former President Obama calling forth all his defensive resources now? Why did former national security advisor Susan Rice write her cya letter? Why have republicans in congress not been willing to investigate the true origins of political surveillance? What is the reason for so much anger, desperation and opposition from a variety of interests?With the release of recent transcripts and the declassification of material from within the IG report, the Carter Page FISA and Flynn documents showing FBI activity, there is a common misconception about why the intelligence apparatus began investigating the Trump campaign in the first place. Why was Donald Trump considered a threat?In this outline we hope to provide some fully cited deep source material that will explain the origin; and specifically why those inside the Intelligence Community began targeting Trump and using Confidential Human Sources against campaign officials.