Exposed: The Firms and Businesses That Funded the Democrat trip to Puerto Rico https://t.co/6H8eA5FVxM
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 15, 2019
The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure.
We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.
As one of the senior officials working without a paycheck, a few words of advice for the president’s next move at shuttered government agencies: lock the doors, sell the furniture, and cut them down.Federal employees are starting to feel the strain of the shutdown.
I am one of them. But for the sake of our nation, I hope it lasts a very long time, till the government is changed and can never return to its previous form.The lapse in appropriations is more than a battle over a wall.
It is an opportunity to strip wasteful government agencies for good.On an average day, roughly 15 percent of the employees around me are exceptional patriots serving their country. I wish I could give competitive salaries to them and no one else. But 80 percent feel no pressure to produce results.
If they don’t feel like doing what they are told, they don’t.Why would they? We can’t fire them. They avoid attention, plan their weekend, schedule vacation, their second job, their next position — some do this in the same position for more than a decade. (RELATED: diGenova and Toensing: Judge Napolitano Is Wrong On The Law and The Facts)They do nothing that warrants punishment and nothing of external value. That is their workday: errands for the sake of errands — administering, refining, following and collaborating on process.
“Process is your friend” is what delusional civil servants tell themselves. Even senior officials must gain approval from every rank across their department, other agencies and work units for basic administrative chores.Process is what we serve, process keeps us safe, process is our core value.
It takes a lot of people to maintain the process. Process provides jobs. In fact, there are process experts and certified process managers who protect the process. Then there are the 5 percent with moxie (career managers).
At any given time they can change, clarify or add to the process — even to distort or block policy counsel for the president.Saboteurs peddling opinion as research, tasking their staff on pet projects or pitching wasteful grants to their friends.
Most of my career colleagues actively work against the president’s agenda. This means I typically spend about 15 percent of my time on the president’s agenda and 85 percent of my time trying to stop sabotage, and we have no power to get rid of them.
Until the shutdown.Due to the lack of funding, many federal agencies are now operating more effectively from the top down on a fraction of their workforce, with only select essential personnel serving national security tasks.
One might think this is how government should function, but bureaucracies operate from the bottom up — a collective of self-generated ideas. Ideas become initiatives, formalize into offices, they seek funds from Congress and become bureaus or sub-agencies, and maybe one day grow to be their own independent agency, like ours.
The nature of a big administrative bureaucracy is to grow to serve itself. I watch it and fight it daily. (RELATED: Remember When Obama And Clinton Shut Down Government For Their Own Pet Projects?)When the agency is full, employees held liable for poor performance respond with threats, lawsuits, complaints and process in at least a dozen offices, taking years of mounting paperwork with no fear of accountability, extending their careers, while no real work is done. Do we succumb to such extortion?
Yes. We pay them settlements, we waive bad reviews, and we promote them.Many government agencies have adopted the position that more complaints are good because it shows inclusion in, you guessed it, the process.
When complaints come, it is cheaper to pay them off than to hold public servants accountable. The result: People accused of serious offenses are not charged, and self-proclaimed victims are paid by you, the American taxpayer.
The message to federal supervisors is clear. Maintain the status quo, or face allegations. Many federal employees truly believe that doing tasks more efficiently and cutting out waste, by closing troubled programs instead of expanding them, “is morally wrong,” as one cried to me.
I get it. These are their pets. It is tough to put them down and let go, and many resist. This phenomenon was best summed up by a colleague who said, “The goal in government is to do nothi
Chris Swecker, former FBI Assistant Director: “I guess the biggest surprise is that anybody would consider the New York Times to be a credible source in this, I mean they’re notorious for not vetting their sources & I get the uneasy feeling that maybe their sources are the very.. pic.twitter.com/t9YTROOiLr
— ⭐️🌟LoRosS26🌟⭐️ (@LoRosS26) January 15, 2019